Shamima Begum left London in 2015 aged 15 and travelled with two school friends to Syria, where she married an IS fighter and gave birth to three children, ...
Announcing the tribunal's decision, Judge Robert Jay said there was a "credible suspicion" that Ms Begum was trafficked to Syria, which he said was for the purposes of "sexual exploitation". Ms Begum, now 23, challenged that decision at a hearing in London in November, when her lawyers argued that Britain's interior ministry, the Home Office, failed to investigate whether she was a "child victim of trafficking". - Her lawyers argued that the Home Office failed to investigate whether she was a "child victim of trafficking"
The British woman, who flew to Syria to join the terror group in 2015, has lost her appeal against the decision to revoke her UK citizenship.
She gave birth to her son, Jarrah, in al-Hawl in February of that year. While in Syria, Begum married an ISIS fighter and spent several years living in Raqqa. Begum, now aged 23, flew to Syria in 2015 with two school friends as a teenager join the ISIS terror group. Begum then reappeared in al-Hawl, a Syrian refugee camp of 39,000 people, in 2019. The following year, the Supreme Court reversed that decision, arguing that the Court of Appeal made four errors when it ruled that Begum should be allowed to return to the UK to carry out her appeal. In 2020, the UK Court of Appeal ruled Begum should be granted leave to enter the country because otherwise, it would not be “a fair and effective hearing.”
Although court found there was 'credible suspicion' that she was trafficked for sexual exploitation as a child, it was not enough for her to win her appeal.
Every possible avenue to challenge this decision will be urgently pursued.” Ms Begum remains in unlawful, arbitrary and indefinite detention without trial in a Syrian camp. Money from shares contributes directly to keep our paper thriving. However the judge added that the commission was concerned by the security services’ “apparent downplaying of the significance of radicalisation and grooming, in stating that what happened to Ms Begum is not unusual.” “But the real point here is that, in the light of Begum, this is exactly the sort of issue that lies within the judgement of the Secretary of State and not the commission.” In its judgement, the commission concludes that there was credible suspicion that Ms Begum was trafficked to Syria for the purposes of sexual exploitation as a child.
The government peddles a caricature so we don't see her for what she is: a child trafficking victim groomed in the UK, says Maya Foa, director of the legal ...
[Shamima Begum](https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/shamima-begum) – something British courts are eminently capable of doing if one day the Crown Prosecution Service decides there is a case to answer – we should judge the government’s failure to take responsibility. Each time one of our allies brings its nationals home, it shows up the UK government’s policy for what it really is: a political posture. There is a growing consensus that the UK’s refusal to repatriate is a failed policy, bad for national and global security. [unlawfully detained without trial](https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2022/feb/10/british-women-and-children-detained-in-syria-failed-by-uk-government-inquiry-finds) in north-east Syria. Reprieve’s research [has shown](https://reprieve.org/uk/2021/04/30/trafficked-to-syria/) that the majority of the women were trafficked by IS, some when they were children. Rather than acknowledge this, or even engage with the debate, the government would rather focus on a caricature of Begum. Despite finding that she was probably groomed and trafficked by Islamic State (IS) at the age of 15, the commission reluctantly found that it could not grant her appeal. Today the commission agreed. This is bunk, a political posture in the absence of a policy. Most of the adults have been stripped of citizenship. [Syria](https://www.theguardian.com/world/syria) by herself; that there is credible suspicion she was trafficked for the purposes of sexual exploitation; and that UK institutions are likely to have failed in their duty to protect her. The judges accepted that “as a matter of basic common sense” Begum was groomed in the UK; that it was not plausible that she could have organised her travel to
Shamima Begum joined the self-proclaimed Islamic State as a teenager, and was stripped of her British citizenship on national security grounds in 2019.
The British government, which argued that assistance with travel was typical for many of those who went to Syria, said the agent had "played no role in encouraging Ms Begum to travel", according to the tribunal's ruling. Judge Robert Jay found there was a "credible suspicion" that Ms Begum was trafficked to Syria for the purposes of "sexual exploitation". But Mr Jay said it was a "sensible inference" that any people who helped Begum and her friends travel to Syria were also encouraging them to make the journey. Ms Begum, who is currently being held in the al-Roj detention camp in north-eastern Syria, argued that the Home Office failed to investigate whether she was a "child victim of trafficking". A British-born woman, who went to Syria as a schoolgirl to join the self-proclaimed Islamic State group (IS) lost her latest appeal against the removal of her British citizenship, but her lawyers vowed to keep fighting and said the case was "nowhere near over". - Ms Begum argued the Home Office failed to investigate whether she was a "child victim of trafficking".
The 23-year-old loses her appeal on national security grounds and means she cannot return to the UK.
Mr Javid also welcomed the ruling. This isn't the first time a legal challenge by Ms Begum's lawyers has failed. A spokesman for the Home Office said it was "pleased" with the outcome, adding: "The government's priority remains maintaining the safety and security of the UK and we will robustly defend any decision made in doing so." "If asked to evaluate all the circumstances of Ms Begum's case, reasonable people with knowledge of all the relevant evidence will differ, in particular in relation to the issue of the extent to which her travel to Syria was voluntary and the weight to be given to that factor in the context of all others," said the judge. "The commission concluded that there was a credible suspicion that Ms Begum had been trafficked to Syria," he said in his summary. Shamima Begum has lost her challenge over the decision to deprive her of British citizenship despite a "credible" case she was trafficked.
As Shamima Begum's appeal is rejected, one writer recalls the time she spent in a Syrian detention camp with Begum and Hoda Muthana who ran away to join ...
And although Hoda was born and raised in America, the US government disputes that she was ever actually a citizen. She worked in the camp and tried to help other women like Shamima and Hoda who had left ISIS. She told me she knows Shamima and Hoda well and was adamant that they should be given the opportunity to return home. She talked about how the group targeted and groomed “younger women who were vulnerable and didn’t know the religion well themselves” and about the problems she was having in the US at the time, alleging that she was facing abuse. When I questioned the camp authorities on the graveyard, they acknowledged it is a “problem” and said they’re currently trying to find more space for a “new graveyard.” At the time, she was about to embark on her biggest court challenge yet, in which she appealed the legality of the government's decision to remove her citizenship. Hoda and Shamima seemed like genuine friends and I was pleased when they said they were happy to show me their lives in the camp. Most adults have also been stripped of their citizenship, and of those, most of the women were found to have been trafficked, and trafficked as children too. And the threat of ISIS was why I was so worried about the trip. I put in an official request to meet some of the women there, then all I had to do was wait. I made it clear that I was there to hear their side of the story. She was 20 when she left the United States to travel to Syria and join ISIS.
Shamima Begum has lost her legal battle with British Government, with regard to her links with Islamic State (ISIS).
The views expressed here are that of the respective authors/ entities and do not represent the views of Economic Times (ET). In the ITV News footage, Ms. While Shamima Begum has expressed her belief that her friend is still alive, Ms. It was at that same age that she, along with 16-year-old [Kadiza Sultana](/topic/kadiza-sultana)and 15-year-old [Amira Abase](/topic/amira-abase), left the UK. Abase had left the UK. Sultana claimed to be a housewife, while intelligence sources alleged that she was involved in stitching explosives into suicide vests. The carnage from twin suicide bombings at Kabul airport will fuel fears that a Taliban-controlled Afghanistan could prove an increasingly powerful magnet for terror groups like Islamic State. On February 11, a court dismissed the argument that the British government had unlawfully revoked Shamima Begum's citizenship. All three girls were married to members of the Islamic State group, but their paths diverged from there. Abase maintained contact with her mother through social media. Here's a closer look at what has happened to Amira Abase and Kadiza In the same year, the trio joined the Islamic State group, and since then, Shamima Begum has gained significant media attention for her efforts to reclaim her British citizenship and come back to the UK.
Begum, whose nationality was stripped after she travelled to Syria to join ISIL (ISIS), continues to fuel debate.
Canada and the UK declined to comment on the allegations, as is routine for security issues involving intelligence agencies. “You are a British/Bangladeshi dual national who, it is assessed, has previously travelled to Syria and aligned with ISIL. It can be removed by the Secretary of State, but not if to do so would render the subject stateless”. “I have one citizenship … Begum will have to take the case directly to the Court of Appeal in London if she wishes to challenge the decision, according to legislation that covers the tribunal. However, the case was taken to the Supreme Court, which ruled in 2021 that while Begum has a right to challenge the decision, she should do so from outside the UK due to “security concerns”. It is assessed that your return to the UK would present a risk to the national security of the United Kingdom,” a letter sent to her family in 2019 by the Secretary of State’s Private Office [denied this](/news/2019/2/21/shamima-begum-is-british-has-no-claim-to-bangladesh-minister) and said she would not be allowed in the country. [newspaper in 2019](/news/2019/2/14/uk-schoolgirl-who-ran-away-to-join-isil-wants-to-come-home), Begum said she was tired of life on the battlefield and feared for her unborn child. Citizenship is a legal status that “means a person has a right to live in a state and that state cannot refuse them entry or deport them”, according to the Migration Observatory of the University of Oxford. The British government stripped Begum of her citizenship in 2019, shortly after she was found in a detention camp in Syria. [lost her latest appeal](/news/2023/2/22/shamima-begum-sees-uk-citizenship-appeal-rejected) against the removal of her citizenship.
Issues related to national security have always been hard to crack, but judges are unwilling to consider human rights, says barrister Conor Gearty.
This has gone beyond national security to embrace economic and social matters, even where discrimination in the enjoyment of individual rights can be plausibly argued. The current supreme court seems to hanker after a past in which judges mainly adjudicated on civil matters and had next to nothing to say about public law. Reflecting that earlier judgment, we see a determination to defer to the widest possible extent to government on the grounds of national security, as well as a lack of any moral urgency in relation to the alleged breaches of Begum’s core human rights. But none of that meant that the secretary of state could not choose to take her citizenship away and then deny her the right to argue against this decision in person. And equally, while the idea that she had travelled entirely voluntarily to Syria, as the secretary of state asserted, might be hard for many to accept, including perhaps even the commission, once again, so what? The Human Rights Act survives in law, it is true – but what of its spirit?
Although she was only 15 years old when she left the UK for Syria to join the Islamic State (ISIS), and despite finding there was “credible suspicion” that ...
The UK government should also repatriate all British nationals, many of whom are women and children, from detention camps in Syria. This leaves Begum in one of two detention camps holding thousands of women and their children as ISIS suspects without charge or trial. The Commission also acknowledged that “reasonable people will profoundly disagree with the Secretary of State,” but dismissed their objections as “wider society and political questions.”