Why City must face 'ultimate consequences' as 'absolute crapshow' with PL looms: UK View.
“Football stopped being a fairytale some time ago. “I like to think that if they’re guilty of the things they’ve been charged with, like any other football club, they get the ultimate consequences. What do you think it means.” If they’re found guilty of 10 years’ worth of financial misrepresentation, what do you think that looks like? They couldn’t care less about a £50 million fine. “What purpose would that serve? [The Guardian’s ](https://www.theguardian.com/football/2023/feb/06/if-manchester-city-are-guilty-they-have-betrayed-football-as-a-spectacle) [Barney Ronay believes](https://www.theguardian.com/football/2023/feb/06/if-manchester-city-are-guilty-they-have-betrayed-football-as-a-spectacle) “we could have an absolute crapshow on our hands.” [talkSPORT’s ](https://talksport.com/football/1324583/simon-jordan-man-city-financial-breaches-charges-martin-keown-arsenal/) [Simon Jordan, ](https://talksport.com/football/1324583/simon-jordan-man-city-financial-breaches-charges-martin-keown-arsenal/)believes the “last thing” the club should be punished with is a financial consequence. Even further, a verdict of guilty might prove once and for all that football is no longer the “fairytale” we all thought is was. “It means the whole rubicon being crossed and saying we either mean it or we don’t. [The Telegraph’s ](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2023/02/06/strip-manchester-city-titles-what-would-do-guilty/) [Jason Burt](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2023/02/06/strip-manchester-city-titles-what-would-do-guilty/) notes that retrospectively punishing City through the measure of stripping titles away “feels like a step too far.” [with ](https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/manchester-city-charged-by-premier-league-with-breaking-financial-rules-3nfrpj36s) [The Times ](https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/manchester-city-charged-by-premier-league-with-breaking-financial-rules-3nfrpj36s) [reporting ](https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/manchester-city-charged-by-premier-league-with-breaking-financial-rules-3nfrpj36s)“if the charges are proved it could lead to a range of sanctions including a points deduction or even expulsion from the league.”
The 2019 F.A. Cup final was “their moment,” as the team's long-serving captain, Troy Deeney, had put it. Like most of his teammates, Deeney had never won a ...
It is not just that the integrity of the whole activity rests on a common acceptance of the rules — the assumption that everyone, be they teams or athletes, are competing under the same conditions — it is that the very meaning rests on it. That City was better is not in question. Three years later, City beat Sunderland to the League Cup. Stoke City lost the F.A. If — and it is if, at this stage — Manchester City is found guilty, though, then the punishments can begin: The panel, according to the league’s statutes, has free rein to issue whatever penalty it sees fit. They are, after all, the most successful clubs in English history, able to console themselves with myriad different glories. The final was portrayed as the apex of But the idea that when tyranny is law, revolution is duty does not hold, not in sports. It would not, in that case, be merely City that suffered. But then the willing suspension of disbelief is the F.A. Winning was unlikely, of course — “massive underdogs,” Deeney had called his team — given that Manchester City, the repeat Premier League champion, stood in the way. It is different, though, if they find out one side wasn’t playing by the same rules.
City said on Monday they were "surprised" to have been charged by the Premier League with 101 alleged breaches of financial rules spanning from 2009/10 to 2017/ ...
Finally, the club are alleged to have breached league rules requiring member clubs to co-operate with and assist the Premier League with its investigations, from December 2018 to date. The second set of breaches listed refers to alleged breaking of rules "requiring a member club to include full details of manager remuneration in its relevant contracts with its manager" related to seasons 2009-10 to 2012-13 inclusive. Manchester City are alleged to have breached league rules requiring provision "in utmost good faith" of "accurate financial information that gives a true and fair view of the club's financial position".
As demonstrations of self-regulation go the Premier League's decision to hit current title holders Manchester City with 100 charges was a bold statement of ...
Because it’s not in the interests of Premier League clubs to remove an anti-competitive safety net. More equitable distribution of the vast wealth further down would help solve this issue, but there is little will from the clubs to do so. Going after Manchester City is not a demonstration it can regulate itself, it is the clubs at the top of the division acting in their self-interest. Like a marina in Monaco or a bank account in the Cayman Islands, if you have the money to buy a hundred-year-old English establishment it’s almost a point of principle that questions won’t be asked about the source of your income or what you intend to do with it. Part of the reason billionaires flock to buy these teams is the lack of rules around who can own a club or what they can do with it. There is one pretty glaring exception to the majority in favor of a regulatory overhaul; the clubs, or perhaps to be more specific, the owners.
Could Erling Haaland soon be running out for a league match at Rochdale or Tranmere Rovers? Are Steven Gerrard and Brendan Rodgers about to get the Premier ...
The reputation of Manchester City, and all associated with the club, is on the line, and so is that of the Premier League, and of the sport in general. The nuclear button has been pressed, the richest members club in football has gone after the richest member in its club. The Premier League and its members would like a verdict by the end of this season, but that feels highly unlikely. It has been achieved by spending huge sums of money, on the best players and the best managers, the best facilities and the best executives. The story will run and run, for sure, especially if City’s battle with UEFA is anything to go by. Fining one of the world’s richest sporting institutions a few quid, or asking Pep Guardiola to work with only one of the best squads in the game - as well as one of the most well-backed youth systems around - for a few transfer windows is hardly going to act as a deterrent, is it?
If the charges are proven, City could face a range of sanctions, including a points deduction, fines or even expulsion from the Premier League.
The regulations are designed to stop clubs running up big losses by over-spending on players. City, the defending league champions, were acquired by their Abu Dhabi-based owners, City Football Group, in 2008. “The members of the commission will be appointed by the independent chair of the Premier League Judicial Panel,” the Premier League said in a statement. City are also alleged to have failed to cooperate with and assist the Premier League in its investigations from December 2018. The club are also charged with failing to comply with Premier League’s rules requiring clubs to follow UEFA’s financial fair play regulations from the 2013-14 to 2017-18 seasons and failing to follow the Premier League’s rules on profit and sustainability from the 2015-16 to 2017-18 seasons. City are alleged by the Premier League to have not fully disclosed managerial remuneration in each of the seasons from 2009-10 to 2012-13, when Roberto Mancini was manager.
English Premier League champions Manchester City may face points deduction or expulsion after the club was charged over alleged financial breaches.
[ABC Emergency](https://www.abc.net.au/emergency/search?query=aurora://location/WA1989&view=map#10/-33.5838/120.0265) Keep up to date with A watch and act warning is in place in WA for a fire at Cowderup in the Shire of Ravensthorpe.
Watford's players sat silent, disconsolate in the Wembley changing room. The 2019 FA Cup final was “their moment”, as the team's long-serving captain, ...
What is at stake, instead, is whether they were in a position to reach all of those finals, to win all of those trophies, while operating under the same rules and restrictions as everyone else. It is not just that the integrity of the whole activity rests on a common acceptance of the rules — the assumption that everyone, be they teams or athletes, are competing under the same conditions — it is that the very meaning rests on it. Three years later, City beat Sunderland to the League Cup. It is possible, of course, to disagree with those rules, to feel that they are arbitrary or antiquated or written by a self-interested elite to protect their own positions, the view that City (among others) have taken of soccer’s attempts at cost control. Stoke City lost the FA Cup final to Manchester City in 2011. They are, after all, the most successful clubs in English history, able to console themselves with myriad different glories. But they would not be the only ones to have lost out. If — and it is if, at this stage — Manchester City is found guilty, though, then the punishments can begin: The panel, according to the league’s statutes, has free rein to issue whatever penalty it sees fit. But the idea that when tyranny is law, revolution is duty does not hold, not in sports. It would not, in that case, be merely City that suffered. And so, too, are the potential consequences. The final was portrayed as the apex of Deeney’s personal redemption arc.