Closing arguments are underway in the Darrell Brooks trial connected to the Waukesha Christmas Parade attack.
[What's next in trial of Darrell Brooks, accused in the Waukesha Christmas Parade rampage?](https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/2022/10/25/whats-next-in-darrell-brooks-waukesha-christmas-parade-tragedy-trial/69589419007/) The jury was then sent away as the two went back and forth for several minutes. [2021 Waukesha Christmas Parade attack](https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/local/waukesha/2021/12/21/waukesha-christmas-parade-2021-updates-victims-suspect-community/8857732002/).
A Wisconsin jury began deliberating a verdict in the trial of Darrell Brooks Jr., accused in the 2021 Waukesha Christmas Parade attack that killed 6.
To jurors, she added: "You don't have to stand and wonder, as he claims to ... Crying freely near the end of his statement, he said, "My conscience is clear" while saying his faith in God carried him through the ordeal. Throughout his closing remarks, Brooks said he was speaking "from the heart" and would not rehash facts presented by prosecutors. Addressing the prosecution's claim of his "utter disregard for human life," Brooks said that his own life experiences, including watching one of his children being born, showed he had no such disregard. "For a year, I have sat while going through this (case)," he said tearfully. Brooks, acting as his own attorney, asked jurors to dismiss the charges and claimed he never intended to hurt anybody. should be convicted](https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/crime/2022/10/01/history-waukesha-parade-suspect-darrell-brooks-and-law-enforcement/10440943002/) of the attack. Pointing to the 61 victims tied to the reckless endangerment charges, she noted prosecutors only selected those who were physically injured from a larger pool of victims who were also at risk. Never," Opper said. He intentionally mowed down innocents when he plowed through the crowd, never stopping at all. The trial has been [mired with constant distractions](https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/2022/10/25/whats-next-in-darrell-brooks-waukesha-christmas-parade-tragedy-trial/69589419007/), loud outbursts and an array of objections as Brooks acts as his own defense attorney, issues that plagued proceedings Tuesday. [closing arguments](https://www.jsonline.com/story/communities/waukesha/news/waukesha/2022/10/25/live-stream-of-darrell-brooks-closing-arguments-in-trial/69591017007/), prosecutors painted Brooks as someone filled with rage and who showed no remorse.
The fate of Darrell Brooks Jr. is now in the hands of a jury. After a three-week-long trial marked by tumult and repeated disruptions by Brooks, ...
She testified that she saw the vehicle veer in and out of the street. The state showed a music video to the jury in which Brooks appears next to his red Ford Escape, the same vehicle they say he drove that day. In the last few weeks, Brooks continued to question the jurisdiction of the court, stated he doesn't want to be recognized by his name and claimed he's a "sovereign citizen," part of a She testified that she never saw the vehicle slow down as it hit some of her friends in the Milwaukee-based group. During the trial, the state showed several videos of Brooks allegedly driving through the crowd. "To say that this has been the most challenging of my career would be an understatement." Allen](https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/397/337/) in her decision to remove Brooks from the courtroom. Brooks nearly forfeited his right to give his closing argument, after he twice defied the judge's order and sought to tell the jury that they could nullify the case. Instead, in a rambling and self-pitying closing statement, Brooks said the act wasn't intentional. He elected to [represent himself](https://www.wpr.org/judge-grants-accused-waukesha-parade-drivers-request-represent-himself-during-jury-trial) in the trial, and has been repeatedly [removed from the courtroom](https://www.wpr.org/outbursts-and-disruptions-defendant-waukesha-christmas-parade-tragedy-delay-jury-selection) for disruptions throughout the proceedings. She asked the jury to "add up the evidence" and return guilty verdicts on all counts against Brooks. The fate of Darrell Brooks Jr.
Jurors in the Darrell Brooks trial came to court on Tuesday with overnight bags as jury instructions were read, and closing arguments were delivered.
"I made a determination I would not stop what was happening in terms of the trial," said Dorow. "I am going to provide the parties with the information I was given this morning," said Dorow. "I pray that the right decision is made." "So again, I go back to all these exhibits, go back to everything that’s been shown, everything that’s been testified to, everything you’ve heard during this whole process and this trial, and again, I say the same thing that I said earlier, same thing I said in opening statements. "The DA wants you to believe that this all came from people," said Brooks. Because of that fact, if the driver panicked, does that make the driver enraged and intent on killing people?" She said the judge could instruct to disregard that and tell Brooks to move on. ""I believe that not only is it fair, but it’s essential that you be privy to all knowledge, not knowledge that certain people feel that you should hear and shouldn’t hear disguised under the color of law," Brooks said. The judge said the circumstances "and your insistence on arguing jury nullification" required her to do so. "I have the right to inform them of their rights and duties under the Constitution." "The time has now come for you to present a closing argument. With the jury absent, Dorow told Brooks he had no right to inform the jury they had the right to nullify, referencing case law.
Jury instructions finished Tuesday morning and Judge Jennifer Dorow hopes both the state and defense will also get through closing arguments.
Judge Dorow ruled Brooks forfeited his right to testify and declared the defense is rested. Judge Dorow is going to keep things moving. Brooks is going to be removed." "The door is open and he's talking. The judge asked Brooks: are you willing to refrain from raising subject matter jurisdiction if you come back to the courtroom? The jury will be sequestered until they reach a verdict on each of the 76 counts. Judge Dorow returns to court after concerns about the integrity of proceedings. It's important to note, once both the state and defense have closed, the jury will be sequestered. The jury deliberated for an hour and 45 minutes. Judge Dorow says she is leaving it to the hands of law enforcement. The poster says Brooks is guilty but has not had a fair trial and is sympathetic toward Brooks. — The Darrell Brooks trial is now in the hands of the jury.
MADISON (WKOW) -- From questioning the judge's legal expertise, to badgering witnesses he is accused of harming, to taking his shirt off in court, ...
Prior to the juror's post, this small subreddit appeared to mostly consist of trolls feigning support for Brooks. Fake Darrell Brooks juror Reddit post. A ...
While the fake juror's Reddit post never actually threatened a mistrial, it was taken seriously enough to become part of the official courtroom proceedings. Despite the AMA's inauthenticity, Brooks unsuccessfully tried to make the argument that the Reddit post should result in a mistrial. Thus, the Redditor behind the post could not have been a juror. Brooks pointed to the juror's knowledge of the case in an attempt to cast the post as legitimate, before being reminded that the trial was being broadcast online all over the world. [addressed the existence of the post](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GA-Nn7ch_K0) but also questioned its legitimacy. The Darrell Brooks trial has received a significant amount of attention online. The user went on to explain that though they believed Brooks committed the crime, they didn't believe he was given a fair trial. On TikTok, the Darrell Brooks [topic page](https://www.tiktok.com/discover/Darrell-Brooks?lang=en) shows that videos about the defendant have received more than 600 million views, with some users [explaining](https://twitter.com/chescaleigh/status/1583603062270095360) how their interest in the case came from TikTok's For You Page recommendations. At one point during the trial, Brooks claimed he was a "sovereign citizen," arguing that he believed the laws of the U.S. The post drew immediate attention not only because jurors are prohibited from using social media during the trial, but also because the anonymous user posted it in a subreddit called r/Justice4Darrell with less than a thousand followers. The post's comments then quickly filled up with some users questioning its legitimacy while others were outraged that the supposed juror would jeopardize the trial by posting on social media at all. [posted to Reddit](https://archive.ph/3j6vT), basically giving any user on the social media platform an open invitation to add their input about the trial.