A new series based on the life and deeds of Jeffrey Dahmer has broken Netflix records and stirred up a controversial debate.
[broke the record](https://www.indiewire.com/2022/09/dahmer-netflix-ratings-record-ryan-murphy-evan-peters-1234767165/) for the biggest-ever opening of a Netflix series, previously held by [Squid Game](https://independentaustralia.net/life/art-display/whats-on-squid-game--netflix-and-kill,15576). [Dan Jensen](https://independentaustralia.net/profile-on/dan-jensen,781) on Twitter [@DanJensenIA](https://twitter.com/DanJensenIA). The finale shows a scene in which fellow serial killer [John Wayne Gacy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Wayne_Gacy) is executed, juxtaposed against a scene depicting Dahmer becoming a born-again Christian on the same day. It's a fascinating and often disturbing look at one of the darkest chapters in American crime and will haunt your thoughts long afterwards. The creators of the series, The standout episode is the sixth in the series, the story of [Evan Peters](https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1404239/?ref_=tt_cl_t_1) plays the role of Jeffrey Dahmer with menacing perfection. And even though news headlines are still made today regarding prejudice among police forces, it’s still shocking to know that a simple background check on Dahmer would have revealed a prior conviction for child molestation, or even having looked further into the identity of Sinthasomphone might have saved the child’s life. The exploration of criminal psychology can be fascinating to many and this show goes pretty deeply into what potentially creates a monster. Through a non-linear timeline, the series explores Dahmer’s childhood and the possible factors that motivated him to commit some of the most [disturbing murders](https://vault.fbi.gov/jeffrey-lionel-dahmer/jeffrey-lionel-dahmer-part-06-of-19) in history. [Dahmer — Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story](https://www.imdb.com/title/tt13207736) is a 10-part Netflix series following the life and crimes of one of America’s most notorious and depraved serial killers. [more popular](https://www.theringer.com/tv/2021/7/9/22567381/true-crime-documentaries-boom-bubble-netflix-hbo).
Richard Jenkins' portrayal of Lionel Dahmer is the emotional core of Dahmer - Monster: the Jeffrey Dahmer Story.
Jenkins' emotional portrayal of a heavily troubled man having to tend to the events surrounding a dysfunctional family and the unique problems surrounding it is a poignant one that serves as the emotional hub of Dahmer - Monster: the Jeffrey Dahmer Story. From that point on, he is able to reconcile some of the events that unfolded over the years. Jenkins' take on Lionel as a man burdened for so long by the questions surrounding his miscreant of a son has, at the very least, come to the forefront and been addressed. As his son gets older, and his behavior grows more and more bizarre, Lionel decides to have Jeffrey live with his elderly mother after being kicked out of both college and the military, Catherine. You can sense that even though he is horrified at the things his son has done, there is almost a sense of relief that it's come to a conclusion and the public will be safe. It's clear that he wants to shift the blame for Jeffrey's failures and ultimate demise onto the shoulders of Joyce, and he never truly lets go of that animus toward her.
Yet people are watching it in droves. For weeks it has been Netflix's top show in Ireland.
(Conversations with a Killer: The John Wayne Gacy Tapes is also in the top 10 this week.) In time a psychotherapist will write a paper called Hunks, Houses and Homicide: The Irish Psyche in a Time of Netflix, and it will all make sense. Of course, as I’ve written before, the world of Paw Patrol is a dystopia in which the emergency services are outsourced to mechanised dogs and everyone bows to the whims of a financially independent child. So, in a way, our children’s sense of the future is even darker than ours. As an Irish Times intellectual I am unwholesomely obsessed with the Irish psyche, and the Netflix top 10 feels like as good a place as any to explore that psyche’s gibbering, gurning id. There’s a void at the centre of the show, and what we’re left with is unnerving, upsetting and philosophically empty. ‘Inexplicably There Is a Serial Killer’ is the thesis statement. Dahmer’s life is presented as a meaningless jumble of biographical details that make his crimes no more or less explicable than before you saw this programme. It’s clear from the start that Dahmer is pretty bad at serial killing, body disposal and police evasion and that he slapsticks his way through it for so long because of institutional racism. I start suspecting the whole show’s an advertorial, that Budweiser did some research, found its main demographic was ‘people who are like Jeffrey Dahmer’ and decided to roll with it. Even in the world of serial killing, it seems, white mediocrity rises to the top. It has all the makings of a network sitcom. Sadly, Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story is actually yet another prestige series about a famous person from the olden days made by the television auteur Ryan Murphy.
In roughly 10 hours, the series takes the audience through the life of an infamous serial killer and how he was able to avoid the police long enough to take the ...
Despite these claims, the series does a respectable job of bringing awareness to how the victims lived as young men. These Hollywood representations trap the families of the victims in a state of perpetual suffering as they keep having to relive the loss of their loved ones, all while reading internet frenzies fascinated with the heinous crimes. Critics feel the show glorifies the Milwaukee Cannibal and forces the families of the victims to relive their pain through the big screen. Nash also depicted the exasperation of the Black community as a whole, whose cries for protection and pleas to be acknowledged by the local authorities were largely ignored. It captures Dahmer’s arrest, the unveiling of multiple dismembered body parts and the disturbing photographs that led to his undoing. He blew audiences away with his ability to capture the gruesome compulsions that overcame Dahmer while incorporating human qualities, such as his awkwardness and self-doubt.
Dahmer – Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story” is the latest biographical drama by Netflix. The show is created by Ryan Murphy, who is known for being the ...
The premise of the show breaks down the many killings of Jeffrey Dahmer between 1978-1991 in the point of view of his victims. While the show does well from a Hollywood perspective, you can’t help but feel mixed about it when it comes to an inadvertent exploitative perspective. “Dahmer – Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story” is the latest biographical drama by Netflix.
So, when Netflix announced it was releasing a series centered around the life and crimes of notorious serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer, I was sold. We all were.
[Blonde in Netflix’s trending column](https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/entertainment/a39072687/netflix-marilyn-monroe-biopic-backlash-explained/), I did that mini appraisal, and realised that I was only considering watching it in the most macabre of ways. If the driving force behind watching a show is sheer voyeurism and sinister curiosity perhaps it’s time we start asking ourselves if that alone justifies perpetuating the exploitation cycle. [hyper-graphic murder and police investigation show](https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/entertainment/g26130535/netflix-best-true-crime-documentaries/), and when a [new crime thriller hits the shelves](https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/entertainment/g13050976/best-psychological-thriller-books/) I read it dutifully (alcoholic-detective-estranged-from-their-family not always, but very often, included). She says she wasn’t contacted by Netflix, and along with other members of her family has spoken out against the use of their trauma for entertainment. So, when Netflix announced it was releasing a series centered around the life and crimes of [notorious serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer,](https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/entertainment/a41348141/monster-the-jeffrey-dahmer-story-netflix-true-events/) I was sold. But isn't it about time production houses and streaming services were questioned on the way they handle these topics? [196 million hours](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-63088009) in its first week. We’ve had the [‘Bundy Binge’ era](https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/entertainment/a37100358/hollywood-obsession-casting-teenage-heartthrobs-serial-killers/), now it seems like we’re moving swiftly into ‘Dahmer Mania’. [Jeffrey Dahmer](https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/entertainment/a35922814/monster-jeffrey-dahmer-story-netflix-release-date-trailer-cast/), nicknamed the ‘Milwaukee Cannibal’ was one of America’s most notorious serial killers, who murdered and dismembered 17 boys and men between 1978 and 1991. Explaining, not only how the show has forced them to relive their trauma in a very visceral way, but also that they were not contacted by Netflix ahead of the series' release. So why do we keep watching when the show forces the victims' families to suffer their trauma over and over again? This strange cultural obsessiveness is a fairly standard part of the weird combination of crime and zeitgeist.
Dahmer—Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story (yes, that really is its title, hyphen and all) stars Evan Peters as the serial killer notorious for having ...
I think there is a Dahmer project that I would defend and I defend the right of artists to try and make projects. And I don’t think it is up to the victims of the world to determine who gets to tell their stories. And I really want to be clear that I think the part of the project that is about explaining how structural and systemic inequity is part of what allowed this terrible thing to happen feels really well done. But given that that is the case, I guess I was surprised, especially given that it’s Ryan Murphy—who I have never been a fan of and who I find sensationalizes everything—I was surprised that this movie had as much respect and care as it did for the victims, for the fact that these stories are hard to tell and not there to be sensationalized. I’m sympathetic to their complaints, but I think journalists have the right to describe the truth of the world as they discover it. I think he brings a lot of pathos to it and underplays it more often than he overplays it. And the show is well-crafted and well-shot and sort of beautiful in how it depicts that. [a piece that Jessica Winter wrote for the New Yorker about the story](https://www.newyorker.com/culture/on-television/netflixs-dahmer-and-the-killer-who-cannot-be-explained) that notes that in its deep exploration of how it is that Dahmer came to be the way that he was, the show just makes a bunch of stuff up. And I don’t know that watching five hours to get to some glimmer of that is a fair ask. That is not what I’m saying, but I’m saying that that combined with the framing, the very first shot of the show is of Niecy Nash, of the neighbor, watching something on TV and being aware that there’s something next door to her that’s wrong. In part, I watched that far because I had read that it takes a big turn in the second half and stops being as much about Dahmer. And I think that starts to happen in the second half of the series.